Technology matching for E-consultation - Revision history

Kennywong: /* References */

2008-04-14T21:17:21Z

‎References

Kennywong: /* Technology Matching for E-Consultation */

2008-04-14T21:17:11Z

‎Technology Matching for E-Consultation

Kennywong: /* Technology Matching for E-Consultation */

2008-04-14T21:09:04Z

‎Technology Matching for E-Consultation

Kennywong: /* Technology Matching for E-Consultation */

2008-04-14T21:08:18Z

‎Technology Matching for E-Consultation

Kennywong: /* Technology Matching for E-Consultation */

2008-04-14T21:07:50Z

‎Technology Matching for E-Consultation

Kennywong: /* Technology Matching for E-Consultation */

2008-04-14T21:06:01Z

‎Technology Matching for E-Consultation

Kennywong: New page: ==Technology Matching for E-Consultation== There are hundreds of potential electronic communication technologies that could be used to support different parts of a consultation. So how ca...

2008-04-14T21:05:41Z

New page: ==Technology Matching for E-Consultation== There are hundreds of potential electronic communication technologies that could be used to support different parts of a consultation. So how ca...

New page

==Technology Matching for E-Consultation==

There are hundreds of potential electronic communication technologies that could be used to support different parts of a consultation. So how can people organizing a consultation choose appropriate technologies? One way, is to consider the stages of a policy-making cycle: agenda setting, analysis, formulation, implementation and monitoring (Macintosh, A. in OECD 2003). However, this takes only the perspective of the consultation organiser, not the consultees. It defines the problem as one of information management in public administration. Another approach is to conceive of consultation as a process analogous to mediation and negotiation, through which different groups come to an accommodation of what should be done (Morison and Newman, 2001) as shown in the following table.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 [[Image:Stages_in_consensus_making.JPG|Center| Stages in Consensus Forming Consultation]]
 ==References==
 <references />

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Technology Matching for E-Consultation==
-There are hundreds of potential electronic communication technologies that could be used to support different parts of a consultation. So how can people organizing a consultation choose appropriate technologies?  One way, is to consider the stages of a policy-making cycle: agenda setting, analysis, formulation, implementation and monitoring (Macintosh, A. in OECD, 2003). However, this takes only the perspective of the consultation organiser, not the consultees. It defines the problem as one of information management in public administration.  Another approach is to conceive of consultation as a process analogous to mediation and negotiation, through which different groups come to an accommodation of what should be done (Morison and Newman, 2001) as shown in the following table.
+There are hundreds of potential electronic communication technologies that could be used to support different parts of a consultation. So how can people organizing a consultation choose appropriate technologies?  One way, is to consider the stages of a policy-making cycle: agenda setting, analysis, formulation, implementation and monitoring (Macintosh, A. in OECD, 2003). However, this takes only the perspective of the consultation organiser, not the consultees. It defines the problem as one of information management in public administration.  Another approach is to conceive of consultation as a process analogous to mediation and negotiation, through which different groups come to an accommodation of what should be done (Morison and Newman, 2001)<ref>Morison, J. & Newman, D. R. (2001) ‘On-line Citizenship: Consultation and Participation in New Labour’s Britain and Beyond’, International Review of Law Computers & Technology, 15(2), 171-194 </ref> as shown in the following table.
 '''Table: Stages in consensus-forming consultations (from Morison and Newman, 2001)'''
 [[Image:Stages_in_consensus_making.JPG|Center| Stages in Consensus Forming Consultation]]
 ==References==
 <references />

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 There are hundreds of potential electronic communication technologies that could be used to support different parts of a consultation. So how can people organizing a consultation choose appropriate technologies?  One way, is to consider the stages of a policy-making cycle: agenda setting, analysis, formulation, implementation and monitoring (Macintosh, A. in OECD, 2003). However, this takes only the perspective of the consultation organiser, not the consultees. It defines the problem as one of information management in public administration.  Another approach is to conceive of consultation as a process analogous to mediation and negotiation, through which different groups come to an accommodation of what should be done (Morison and Newman, 2001) as shown in the following table.
-[[Image:Stages_in_consensus_making.JPG|Center| Stages in Consensus Making]]
+'''Table: Stages in consensus-forming consultations (from Morison and Newman, 2001)'''
 ==References==
 <references />

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 There are hundreds of potential electronic communication technologies that could be used to support different parts of a consultation. So how can people organizing a consultation choose appropriate technologies?  One way, is to consider the stages of a policy-making cycle: agenda setting, analysis, formulation, implementation and monitoring (Macintosh, A. in OECD, 2003). However, this takes only the perspective of the consultation organiser, not the consultees. It defines the problem as one of information management in public administration.  Another approach is to conceive of consultation as a process analogous to mediation and negotiation, through which different groups come to an accommodation of what should be done (Morison and Newman, 2001) as shown in the following table.
-[Image:Stages_in_consensus_making.JPG|Center| Stages in Consensus Making]
+[[Image:Stages_in_consensus_making.JPG|Center| Stages in Consensus Making]]
 ==References==
 <references />

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 There are hundreds of potential electronic communication technologies that could be used to support different parts of a consultation. So how can people organizing a consultation choose appropriate technologies?  One way, is to consider the stages of a policy-making cycle: agenda setting, analysis, formulation, implementation and monitoring (Macintosh, A. in OECD, 2003). However, this takes only the perspective of the consultation organiser, not the consultees. It defines the problem as one of information management in public administration.  Another approach is to conceive of consultation as a process analogous to mediation and negotiation, through which different groups come to an accommodation of what should be done (Morison and Newman, 2001) as shown in the following table.
 ==References==
 <references />

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:06, 14 April 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Technology Matching for E-Consultation==		==Technology Matching for E-Consultation==

−	There are hundreds of potential electronic communication technologies that could be used to support different parts of a consultation. So how can people organizing a consultation choose appropriate technologies? One way, is to consider the stages of a policy-making cycle: agenda setting, analysis, formulation, implementation and monitoring (Macintosh, A. in OECD 2003). However, this takes only the perspective of the consultation organiser, not the consultees. It defines the problem as one of information management in public administration. Another approach is to conceive of consultation as a process analogous to mediation and negotiation, through which different groups come to an accommodation of what should be done (Morison and Newman, 2001) as shown in the following table.	+	There are hundreds of potential electronic communication technologies that could be used to support different parts of a consultation. So how can people organizing a consultation choose appropriate technologies? One way, is to consider the stages of a policy-making cycle: agenda setting, analysis, formulation, implementation and monitoring (Macintosh, A. in OECD, 2003). However, this takes only the perspective of the consultation organiser, not the consultees. It defines the problem as one of information management in public administration. Another approach is to conceive of consultation as a process analogous to mediation and negotiation, through which different groups come to an accommodation of what should be done (Morison and Newman, 2001) as shown in the following table.
		+
		+
		+	==References==
		+	<references />