Difference between revisions of "Process and Planning"

From E-Consultation Guide
Jump to: navigation, search
(Plan: Traditional and Technological Mix)
m
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
The process and planning stage was a collaborative approach between the Waterways Ireland staff and [http://www.e-consultation.org/ research project team].
 +
 
==Focus==
 
==Focus==
 
It was decided by [http://www.waterwaysireland.org Waterways Ireland] that the consultation would concentrate on:
 
It was decided by [http://www.waterwaysireland.org Waterways Ireland] that the consultation would concentrate on:
* The Internal Screening Process
+
* [http://waterways.e-consultation.org/topic-a.php The Internal Screening Process]
* Policies for the Equality Impact Assessment
+
* [http://waterways.e-consultation.org/topic-b.php Policies for the Equality Impact Assessment]
 
 
  
 
==Plan: Traditional and Technological Mix==
 
==Plan: Traditional and Technological Mix==
The consultation organisers wanted to include e-consultation elements in an overall consultation process that ran along traditional lines, in which respondents could send in written submissions or request a meeting with the consulters. The organisers were experienced in running consultations, it was the [http://waterways.e-consultation.org/consultation.php electronic communications component] that was new to them.
+
The consultation organisers wanted to include e-consultation elements in an overall consultation process that ran along traditional lines.  The traditional element allowed respondents to send in written submissions or request a face-to-face meeting with the consulters. The organisers were experienced in running traditional consultations; however, it was the [http://waterways.e-consultation.org/consultation.php electronic communications component, or web site approach], that was new to them.
  
 
After a number of meetings between the research group and [http://www.waterwaysireland.org Waterways Ireland], it was decided that the team would design a [http://waterways.e-consultation.org/consultation.php web site].
 
After a number of meetings between the research group and [http://www.waterwaysireland.org Waterways Ireland], it was decided that the team would design a [http://waterways.e-consultation.org/consultation.php web site].
  
 
==Process==
 
==Process==
Potential respondents could browse the [http://waterways.e-consultation.org/consultation.php consultation documents], then join a discussion forum where they could leave comments on the issues that interested them.
+
To participate in the consultation, it was envisaged that potential respondents could browse the [http://waterways.e-consultation.org/online-doc.php online consultation documents], then join a [http://waterways.e-consultation.org/forum/index.php discussion forum] where they could leave comments on the issues that interested them.
 
 
There then followed a short process of negotiation in relation to the design of the site. The research team took the [http://www.waterwaysireland.org Waterways Ireland] consultation document, converted it to HTML and put it on-line.  
 
  
Our developers set up a discussion forum, and showed the consultation organisers how to enter the first questions to start off the discussion.  
+
There then followed a short process of negotiation in relation to the design of the web site. The research team took the [http://www.waterwaysireland.org Waterways Ireland] [http://waterways.e-consultation.org/online-doc.php consultation document], converted it to HTML and put it on-line.  
  
 +
Then, the research team developers set up a [http://waterways.e-consultation.org/forum/index.php discussion forum] before showing the consultation organisers how to enter the first questions to start off a discussion.
  
 
==Review==
 
==Review==
 
Every part of the site was reviewed by [http://www.waterwaysireland.org Waterways Ireland] and amended in accordance with their suggestions. The result, for better or worse, was a site that mirrored their off-line consultation.
 
Every part of the site was reviewed by [http://www.waterwaysireland.org Waterways Ireland] and amended in accordance with their suggestions. The result, for better or worse, was a site that mirrored their off-line consultation.

Latest revision as of 16:03, 21 September 2007

The process and planning stage was a collaborative approach between the Waterways Ireland staff and research project team.

Focus

It was decided by Waterways Ireland that the consultation would concentrate on:

Plan: Traditional and Technological Mix

The consultation organisers wanted to include e-consultation elements in an overall consultation process that ran along traditional lines. The traditional element allowed respondents to send in written submissions or request a face-to-face meeting with the consulters. The organisers were experienced in running traditional consultations; however, it was the electronic communications component, or web site approach, that was new to them.

After a number of meetings between the research group and Waterways Ireland, it was decided that the team would design a web site.

Process

To participate in the consultation, it was envisaged that potential respondents could browse the online consultation documents, then join a discussion forum where they could leave comments on the issues that interested them.

There then followed a short process of negotiation in relation to the design of the web site. The research team took the Waterways Ireland consultation document, converted it to HTML and put it on-line.

Then, the research team developers set up a discussion forum before showing the consultation organisers how to enter the first questions to start off a discussion.

Review

Every part of the site was reviewed by Waterways Ireland and amended in accordance with their suggestions. The result, for better or worse, was a site that mirrored their off-line consultation.